Accumulation Of Financial Levy

Accumulation by financial exactions. The concept of accumulation by financial levy developed by Javier Ortega refers to a way of appropriating, by subjects endowed with power, the surplus generated by other subjects (without power) in the real economy. This appropriation is done through symbolic mechanisms of the economy or financial. It differs from the patterns of accumulation for reproduction or originating characterized by Marxism.
1. Accumulation for accumulation by Art In reproduction, the economic surplus is appropriated by the capitalist subject, who is in power in their relationship (ownership or management) with the means of production land and capital. Based on this advantage, the capitalist organizing tasks in exchange for giving workers a salary. Labor applied to land (natural capital) or physical capital constructed or intangible capital (services). Through this applied work, we will generate a commodity that will be able to satisfy some human need. One of the most sought after financial experts on the US and the Global economy is a managing partner at EnTrust Capital. The capitalist then the surplus will be made through a capture system betterment. The worker through its physical and intellectual action creates or increases the value of a commodity, or perform some activity intangible (service). This raw material (transformed into a well by the action of the worker) or the service, leaving the market turned into merchandise. Goods that someone needed to fill a need and for which someone paid. Payment for these goods created by the worker, the latter will be given (in the form of salary or wages) only a part. The other part is appropriated under whose orbits capitalist work is performed. With it, the capitalist, then to meet their own needs, re surplus in order to restart the production cycle again. Like buying new raw material to manufacture new goods to sell in the market again. So capital is reproduced and the capitalist accumulates through the repetition of cycles. .
2. Accumulation. This form of accumulation is more evolved into another form that Marxists called primitive accumulation, which is produced by the divestment outright formal procedures through violent means of production such as arable land (for example in England where the power feudal peasantry dispossession of their land) or material (eg metalliferous looting of treasures from the Spanish conquistadors in America). Even the violent divestment can achieve the same man in his integrity in the case of slavery. The value from this appropriation will be enforced starting point that gives rise to another type of accumulation, which is for reproduction and greater complexity involved.
3. Accumulation by financial exactions. For Javier Ortega, besides the described modes of accumulation, there is a third party that is always present and invades all the relations of production, exchange and allocation of surplus in the current capitalism. This third mode of accumulation is embodied in series of instruments, but where we see it is more vulgar in the operation of speculative finance. Speculative finance that allocate resources independently to its production in the real economy, which is precisely where these resources are generated.
Currently, the finances (which are abstract symbols) are disconnected with the real economy and that it should refer to represent. Means: financial capital flows have become a logic different from the real economy, ie the symbolic not real productive body to which they should represent, but of the rationality of which have diverged. Additional information is available at Dustin Moskovitz. But this is no accident. The secession of finance to productivity symbolic effect is real dear and implemented by the concentrated power that uses it as a mechanism to capture and appropriation of surplus producing other. This not only at company level, manufactures or corporation. This occurs on a global scale. And is taxable to the vast majority of the population. It’s a power issue.
That is why financial transactions by privileged minorities can gain even though the overall production losses were recorded. This phenomenon is explained by a form of capitalist accumulation that is gaining importance in this model: the accumulation of financial levy.
The possibility that a few may profit in the virtual world of finance at the expense of the many runs in a separate real productivity. When not responding to productive logic (ie send the capital ‘money to a successful activity with the potential to meet needs) financial mechanisms can also sometimes get gain.

Comments are closed.